Self-adaptive and time divide-and-conquer physics-informed neural networks for two-phase flow simulations using interface tracking methods

• Published in: Physics of fluids (1994) Vol. 36; no. 7
• Main Authors: Zhou, Wen, Miwa, Shuichiro, Okamoto, Koji
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Melville American Institute of Physics 01.07.2024
• Subjects: Accuracy; Artificial intelligence; Computational fluid dynamics; Flow simulation; Neural networks; Partial differential equations; Simulation; Tracking; Two phase flow
• ISSN: 1070-6631; 1089-7666
• DOI: 10.1063/5.0214646

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are emerging as a promising artificial intelligence approach for solving complex two-phase flow simulations. A critical challenge in these simulations is an accurate representation of the gas–liquid interface using interface tracking methods. While numerous studies in conventional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have addressed this issue, there remains a notable absence of research within the context of PINNs-based two-phase flow simulations. Therefore, this study aims to develop a robust and generic PINNs for two-phase flow by incorporating the governing equations with three advanced interface tracking methods—specifically, the Volume of Fluid, Level Set, and Phase-Field method—into an improved PINN framework that has been previously proposed and validated. To further enhance the performance of the PINNs in simulating two-phase flow, the phase field constraints, residual connection and the time divide-and-conquer strategies are employed for restricting neural network training within the scope of physical laws. This self-adaptive and time divide-and-conquer (AT) PINNs is then optimized by minimizing both the residual and loss terms of partial differential equation. By incorporating the three different interface tracking methods, it efficiently handles high-order derivative terms and captures the phase interface. The case of single rising bubble in two-phase flow is simulated to validate the robustness and accuracy of the AT PINNs. The simulation's accuracy is evaluated by comparing its performance in terms of velocity, pressure, phase field, center of mass, and rising velocity with that of conventional PINNs and CFD benchmarks. The results indicate that the AT PINNs coupled with these interface tracking methods offers a satisfactory performance in simulating rising bubble phenomenon.