Making Peace Visible: Colors in Visual Peace Research

Peace is not an absence, but rather a visibly identifiable set of norms. This visualization can take place through internationally recognized signs such as the white flag and the blue helmet. These representations of norms are united in their ability to be distinguished from similar objects or signs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPeace and change Vol. 45; no. 1; pp. 55 - 77
Main Authors Vuori, Juha A., Guillaume, Xavier T., Andersen, Rune S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2020
Subjects
Customary law
International law
Peace
Peace studies
Political parties
Symbols
War
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Peace is not an absence, but rather a visibly identifiable set of norms. This visualization can take place through internationally recognized signs such as the white flag and the blue helmet. These representations of norms are united in their ability to be distinguished from similar objects or signs through their use of colors. The identificatory use of color avoids confusion between parties embroiled in a conflict, making an organization or envoy stand out and creating the expectation that they are encompassed by the specific norms of warfare, which these colors make visible. Through establishing such “dumb signs” of peace, as Grotius put it, the colors of peace have, we argue, played a notable part in establishing customary international law. The aim of our contribution is to offer an illustrative chromatological analysis of how peace and its norms are made visible through objects and symbols which are not connected with peace beyond their coloring (e.g., emblems, flags, helmets, or warzone vehicles). We show how certain colors, in their situated use, come to both symbolize and enact peace in terms of international politics.
ISSN:0149-0508
1468-0130
DOI:10.1111/pech.12387