Comparative Study on the Clinical Trial of Acupotomy Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation

Background: The primary aim of this study is to statistically analyze and compare the difference in treatment outcomes based on the frequency and duration of acupotomy treatment for lumbar disk herniation. Methods: The evaluation of efficacy and safety involved using visual analog scale (VAS), numer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of acupuncture research Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. 252 - 264
Main Authors Kim, Beom Seok, Jeon, Ju Hyun, Park, Tae Yong, Kim, Hong Kyoung, Kim, Young Il
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published MEDrang Inc 01.08.2023
대한침구의학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: The primary aim of this study is to statistically analyze and compare the difference in treatment outcomes based on the frequency and duration of acupotomy treatment for lumbar disk herniation. Methods: The evaluation of efficacy and safety involved using visual analog scale (VAS), numeric rating scale (NRS), Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), EuroQol 5-dimention (EQ-5D), and similar parameters. This was achieved through the establishment of a comparable cohort using propensity score matching. Group A comprised 46 patients who underwent 4 sessions of acupotomy treatment for 2 weeks, while Group B consisted of 15 patients who received 6 acupotomy sessions for 3 weeks. Results: For Group A, the average amount of change in VAS values at weeks 4 and 6 was significantly decreased. However, the average amount of change in RMDQ values was not significant. Notably, the average amount of change of EQ-5D values at week 6 increased significantly. As for Group B, the average amount of change of NRS values in weeks 2 and 3 was significantly decreased. Conversely, the average amount of change in RMDQ and EQ-5D values was not significant. In comparing the 2 groups at the final follow-up, the average amount of change in all evaluation values was not significant. Further, no significant interaction effect was observed in the changes over time in all evaluation values between the 2 groups. Conclusion: This study establishes that there was no statistically significant difference in pain reduction, functional impairment, and quality of life improvement between 2 group.
ISSN:2586-288X
2586-2898
DOI:10.13045/jar.2023.00122