Reply to Bayrak’s comments on “An investigation of seismicity for western anatolia” by Sayil and Osmanşahin (2008)

The author looked over the comments of Critle, and can say that this is not a scientific criticization. It is very clear that the subject of the paper is one of the general seismicity studies based on statistical methods for a defined region. Besides, it has similar format with such a kind of studie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNatural hazards (Dordrecht) Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 1 - 3
Main Authors Sayil, Nilgun, Osmansahin, Ilhan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.07.2009
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Civil Engineering
Criticism
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental Management
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hydrogeology
Natural Hazards
Seismology
Statistical methods
Main Shock
Linear Regression Method
Body Wave
Fault Segment
Fault Zone
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0921-030X
1573-0840
DOI10.1007/s11069-008-9329-0

Cover

More Information
Summary:The author looked over the comments of Critle, and can say that this is not a scientific criticization. It is very clear that the subject of the paper is one of the general seismicity studies based on statistical methods for a defined region. Besides, it has similar format with such a kind of studies in literature (Papazachos 1989; Papazachos and Papaioannou 1993; Sayil and Osmansahin 2004; Sayil and Osmansahin 2005a, b; Sayil and Osmansahin 2006; Sayil 2007.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Commentary-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0921-030X
1573-0840
DOI:10.1007/s11069-008-9329-0