Comments on the high-frequency response of hemispherical grounding electrodes with emphasis on magnetic induction effects

•Inductance of hemispherical grounding electrodes.•Electrode impedance based on an electromagnetic field approach.•Analytical solutions for low and high frequencies.•3D benchmark for numerical solvers. Accurate calculation of electrodes’ impedance is of major importance for the operation and protect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inElectric power systems research Vol. 238; p. 111100
Main Authors Brandão Faria, José, Machado, Vitor Maló
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.01.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Inductance of hemispherical grounding electrodes.•Electrode impedance based on an electromagnetic field approach.•Analytical solutions for low and high frequencies.•3D benchmark for numerical solvers. Accurate calculation of electrodes’ impedance is of major importance for the operation and protection of overhead power lines whose towers are periodically bonded to earth via grounding electrodes; particularly when the towers are hit by lightning discharges. A recent paper has proposed a simple RC-circuit to model the frequency response of hemispherical electrodes which predicts a continuous decrease to zero in electrode impedance as the frequency increases. The prediction agrees with the model, but the model is not sound and, therefore, the prediction is disputable. We show that the model is inadequate because it is founded on the conviction that the magnetic field is zero everywhere inside the soil ___which we claim is a mistake. We employ a full-wave FEM solver to recalculate the numerical results presented in that paper and observed a notable disagreement for high frequencies. In addition, we also show how the problem of calculating the impedance of hemispherical grounding systems can be solved, encompassing displacement-current effects and magnetic-field effects.
ISSN:0378-7796
DOI:10.1016/j.epsr.2024.111100