Challenges in contemporary spinal robotics: encouraging spine surgeons to drive transformative changes in the development of future robotic platforms

The field of spinal robotics has witnessed considerable advances, which have primarily focused on enhancing pedicle screw placement. This article critically evaluates the current direction of spinal robotics development, raising concerns about the disproportionate emphasis on pedicle screw placement...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 540 - 547
Main Authors Malham, Gregory M, Wells-Quinn, Thomas A, Nowitzke, Adrian M, Mobbs, Ralph J, Sekhon, Lali H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China AME Publishing Company 23.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The field of spinal robotics has witnessed considerable advances, which have primarily focused on enhancing pedicle screw placement. This article critically evaluates the current direction of spinal robotics development, raising concerns about the disproportionate emphasis on pedicle screw placement when existing techniques already yield commendable results. Discussions on various parameters, including quality, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility, highlight the need for a broader perspective in the development of robotics for spinal surgery. Comparative analyses reveal that navigation systems offer cost-effective and time-efficient alternatives to robotics, with similar accuracy levels. Patient demand for robotic interventions is influenced by perceived superiority, warranting careful consideration of public sentiment. This article also underscores the need for future spine surgeons to maintain proficiency in traditional techniques. The influence of industry and key opinion leaders in steering the focus toward pedicle screw placement is discussed, emphasizing the need for a more holistic approach. Accessibility issues and legal considerations in the evolving field of spinal robotics are addressed, and the potential for robotics to enhance various aspects of surgical procedures beyond pedicle screw placement is explored. In conclusion, we advocate for a shift in focus in spinal robotics, emphasizing the untapped potential to streamline common surgical procedures (such as discectomy, laminectomy, and endoscopy), enhance precision, and improve patient outcomes in areas beyond pedicle screw placement. Future advances in spinal robotics have the potential to transform the surgical landscape, benefitting all stakeholders, including patients, surgeons, and hospitals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Contributions: (I) Conception and design: GM Malham, TA Wells-Quinn; (II) Administrative support: GM Malham; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: All authors; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: All authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.
ISSN:2414-469X
2414-4630
DOI:10.21037/jss-24-4