Three-dimensional CT-Guided Bronchoscopy With a Real-Time Electromagnetic Position Sensor

To compare two different imageregistration methods for accurately displaying the position of aflexible bronchoscope on a previously acquired three-dimensional CTscan during bronchoscopy. Bronchoscopy suiteof a university hospital. Fifteen adultpatients scheduled for nonemergent bronchoscopy. A minia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChest Vol. 118; no. 6; pp. 1783 - 1787
Main Authors Solomon, Stephen B., White Jr, Peter, Wiener, Charles M., Orens, Jonathan B., Wang, Ko Pen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.12.2000
American College of Chest Physicians
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare two different imageregistration methods for accurately displaying the position of aflexible bronchoscope on a previously acquired three-dimensional CTscan during bronchoscopy. Bronchoscopy suiteof a university hospital. Fifteen adultpatients scheduled for nonemergent bronchoscopy. A miniature electromagnetic positionsensor was placed at the tip of a flexible bronchoscope. Previouslyacquired three-dimensional CT scans were registered with the patient inthe bronchoscopy suite. Registration method 1 used multiple skinfiducial markers. Registration method 2 used the inner surface of thetrachea itself for registration. Method 1 was objectively assessed bymeasuring the error distance between the real skin marker position andthe computer display position. Methods 1 and 2 were subjectivelyassessed by the bronchoscopist correlating visual bronchoscopicanatomic location with the computer display position on the CTimage. The error distance (± SD) from knownpoints for registration method 1 was 5.6 ± 2.7 mm. Objective errordistances were not measured for method 2 because no accurate placementof the bronchoscope sensor could be correlated with CT position. Subjectively, method 2 was judged more accurate than method 1 whencompared with the fiberoptic view of the airways through thebronchoscope. Additionally, method 2 had the advantage of not requiringplacement of fiducial markers before the CT scan. Respiratory motioncontributed an error of 3.6 ± 2.6 mm, which was partially compensatedfor by a second tracking sensor placed on the patient’s chest. Image registration method 2 of surface fittingthe trachea rather than method 1 of fiducial markers was subjectivelyjudged to be superior for registering the position of a flexiblebronchoscope during bronchoscopy. Method 2 was also more practicalinasmuch as no special CT scanning technique was required beforebronchoscopy.
ISSN:0012-3692
1931-3543
DOI:10.1378/chest.118.6.1783