The outcome of embryo transfer after three different procedures for laparoscopic correction of hydrosalpinx
To compare the effect of three different surgical approaches: simple terminal salpingostomy, bilateral proximal tubal ligation plus terminal salpingostomy, and bilateral salpingectomy. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 292 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
28.09.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To compare the effect of three different surgical approaches: simple terminal salpingostomy, bilateral proximal tubal ligation plus terminal salpingostomy, and bilateral salpingectomy.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 292 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for hydrosalpinx and embryo transfer within 2 years postoperatively from January 2018 to August 2021. The patients were divided into three groups: Group A (68 cases) underwent simple terminal salpingostomy, Group B (199 cases) underwent ligation plus terminal salpingostomy, and Group C (25 cases) underwent bilateral salpingectomy.
Age, body mass index, surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, and infertility type showed no significant differences among the different surgical groups (P > 0.05), except for the age 30-39 group, which showed statistically significant differences in surgical time (P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001); the age 40 or above group showed statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.008). A total of 336 oocyte retrievals and 451 embryo transfers were successfully performed in the 292 patients within 2 years postoperatively.
The choice of surgical approach for hydrosalpinx does not affect pregnancy rates after embryo transfer within the same age group. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0020-7292 1879-3479 1879-3479 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ijgo.15932 |