Histopathological findings and diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis, confirmed by PCR, in an endemic region of Brazil

Diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is difficult, and the correct use of histopathological criteria can be useful in clinical practice. The present study evaluates the association between histopathological findings and the results of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in clinically suspected case...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of infection in developing countries Vol. 18; no. 6; pp. 895 - 899
Main Authors Pena, Heber P, Belo, Vinícius S, Fontes, Igor dC, De Melo, Saulo N, Soares, Paulo Ha, Santos, Ingrid M, Leitão, Tiago J, Costa, Maria Zélia dO, Teixeira-Neto, Rafael G, Da Silva, Eduardo S, Xavier-Junior, José Cândido C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Italy 30.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is difficult, and the correct use of histopathological criteria can be useful in clinical practice. The present study evaluates the association between histopathological findings and the results of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in clinically suspected cases of CL. Skin samples were received in a laboratory from an endemic region of Brazil for over nine years. Associations were analyzed by means of the Chi square test with a 5% level of significance. Of the 222 examined samples, 190 (85.6%) tested positive by PCR. All 25 cases identified by microscopic examination also tested positive by PCR. Except for the more intense inflammatory infiltrate, all other evaluated histological variables (ulceration, epidermal hyperplasia, hyperkeratosis, presence of granuloma, neutrophils, histiocytes, lymphocytes, plasmocytes, and necrosis) were not significantly associated with PCR positivity. The intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate is a good indicator of the occurrence of CL. Histopathological aspects are useful to increase the predictive values of CL diagnoses, but PCR is still necessary to confirm or exclude the disease.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1972-2680
1972-2680
DOI:10.3855/jidc.18120