Systematic review of environmental noise in neonatal intensive care units

To systematically review the literature on noise exposure within the neonatal intensive care unit/special care nursery settings, specifically to describe: noise characteristics, sources of noise and ways of measuring noise. Systematic searches were conducted through databases Medline, Embase and Pub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa Paediatrica
Main Authors Andy, Liang, Fan, He, Valerie, Sung, Jing, Wang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Norway 03.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To systematically review the literature on noise exposure within the neonatal intensive care unit/special care nursery settings, specifically to describe: noise characteristics, sources of noise and ways of measuring noise. Systematic searches were conducted through databases Medline, Embase and PubMed. Studies were included if they met the inclusion criteria (1) reported noise characteristics; (2) reported noise exposure measurements; (3) in the neonatal intensive care unit/ special care nursery settings. Methods and key findings were extracted from included studies. Quality analysis was done using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We identified 1651 studies, screened 871, reviewed 112 and included 47. All reported NICU average equivalent sound levels were consistently louder than recommended guidelines (45 dB). The most consistent association with higher sound pressure levels were noise sources grouped under people congregation. Half of the studies did not use measuring devices adhering to international sound level meter (SLM) standards. All NICUs exceeded recommended accumulative sound levels. People were the most consistent source of noise. Sound pressure levels need to be consistently measured with devices adhering to international SLM standards in future studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0803-5253
1651-2227
1651-2227
DOI:10.1111/apa.17445