Treatment of Colorectal Lung Metastases: Two Centers Retrospective Study

Clear guidelines for colorectal lung metastasis (LM) treatment are not available. This study aimed to provide insight into the treatment strategies and efficacy of local and systemic therapy in patients with LM eligible for (potentially) curative treatment. This was a retrospective study of patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDigestive diseases (Basel) p. 1
Main Authors Krul, Myrtle F, van Rees, Jan M, de Boer, Amihan M, Neve, Karlijn K, Verhoef, Cornelis, Kuhlmann, Koert F D, Baetens, Tarik R, Buffart, Tineke E, Knegjens, Joost L, Klomp, Houke M, Ruers, Theo J M, de Vries, Marianne, Rothbarth, Joost, van Meerten, Esther, Nuyttens, Joost J M E, Grünhagen, Dirk, Kok, Niels F M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland 15.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Clear guidelines for colorectal lung metastasis (LM) treatment are not available. This study aimed to provide insight into the treatment strategies and efficacy of local and systemic therapy in patients with LM eligible for (potentially) curative treatment. This was a retrospective study of patients with ≤5 LM discussed in two tertiary referral centers. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between treatment groups. Treatment strategies were compared between centers and survival data between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, and treating centers. Ninety-two patients (median 2 LMs) were included. Seventy-one (77%) patients underwent local treatment (17 surgery, 13 ablation, 38 radiotherapy, 3 combination of local treatments) and 21 (23%) with systemic therapy alone. The latter group more frequently had extrapulmonary metastases (81.0% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001) and synchronous presentation of LM (23.8% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.045). Choice of local versus systemic therapy and time to start treatment after diagnosis (median 109 days, IQR 44-240 vs. 88 days, IQR 53-168) were comparable between centers. Three-year survival rates did not differ between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, or treating centers. Treatment strategies and oncological outcomes were rather similar between centers. Survival outcomes were not different between locally and systemically treated patients.
ISSN:1421-9875
DOI:10.1159/000539927