Comparison of measured dietary consumption of calcium, phosphorus, iron and potassium with calculated values by "Weighing method", "purchasing method" and "recall method" concerning food consumption

Three survey methods for dietary consumption, i. e. (1) weighing all food stuffs prior to cooking (weighing method), (2) purchasing the same meal as consumed and separating it into food stuffs (purchasing method), and (3) asking the housewives who cooked the meal to recall the composition and weight...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNihon Eiyō, Shokuryō Gakkai shi Vol. 38; no. 5; pp. 387 - 394
Main Authors Kumae, T, Sugawara, K, Machida, K, Ohshita, Y, Shimaoka, A. (Oita Medical Coll., Hazama (Japan))
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japan Society of Nutrition and Food Science 1985
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Three survey methods for dietary consumption, i. e. (1) weighing all food stuffs prior to cooking (weighing method), (2) purchasing the same meal as consumed and separating it into food stuffs (purchasing method), and (3) asking the housewives who cooked the meal to recall the composition and weight of food stuffs used (recall method), were concurrently tested on a total of 30 meals served by 10 housewives living in an agricultural village in Oita Prefecture in the southern part of Japan. Using the new version of the Japanese Standard Food Consumption Table (4th edition), calcium, phosphorus, iron and potassium contents of each meal were calculated by each survey method and the values obtained were compared with the measured values. Calcium, phosphorus and iron were simultaneously measured by inductively coupled argon plasma (ICP) spectrophotometer (JY48P JobinYbon) and potassium content in meals was measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Zeeman 180-80 Hitachi). Good correlations between calculated values and the corresponding measured ones were observed, i. e. (1) for calcium content: 0.799, 0.800 and 0.655, (2) for phosphorus content: 0.840, 0.843 and 0.627, (3) for iron content: 0.565, 0.733 and 0.545, (4) for potassium content: 0.857, 0.746 and 0.742 respectively for weighing, purchasing and recall methods. Out of 12 combinations, six comparisons of calculated values versus measured values differed significantly by paired t-test analysis, i. e. (1) for the weighing method, the mean values were larger for phosphorus (p<0.01) and potassium (p<0.01), (2) for the purchasing method, the mean values were smaller for calcium (p< 0.01), phosphorus (p<0.05) and iron (p< 0.05), (3) for the recall method, the mean values of calcium (p<0.01) was smaller. One reason for the differences may be that the main mineral contributor of these sample meals was homegrown vegetables which can vary in mineral contents by seasons and areas of production, therefore, the measured mineral contents differed from the reported values of the new version of the Japanese Standard Food Composition Table.
Bibliography:8701611
Q04
S01
ISSN:0287-3516
1883-2849
DOI:10.4327/jsnfs.38.387