Fair Trade, Diversification and Structural Change: Towards a Broader Theoretical Framework of Analysis Commentary

This paper responds to the argument that while Fair Trade governance might increase short-term welfare, it reduces long-term development prospects by discouraging diversification and structural change. Even though it is agreed that lower-value sectors, such as commodity agriculture, are unlikely to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOxford development studies Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 457 - 478
Main Author Smith, Alastair M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.12.2009
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper responds to the argument that while Fair Trade governance might increase short-term welfare, it reduces long-term development prospects by discouraging diversification and structural change. Even though it is agreed that lower-value sectors, such as commodity agriculture, are unlikely to offer a long-term solution to global income inequalities, the importance of their short- and medium-term contributions cannot be ignored. Furthermore, critics have evaluated Fair Trade governance against the benchmark of perfect market organization. However, given the realities of the developing world, dismantling Fair Trade abandons poor producers not to theoretical free markets and successful diversification, but to market failures, capability constraints, and risk management issues-all of which present serious obstacles to beneficial change. In light of this, analysis of the Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International is used to argue that, far from being detrimental, Fair Trade might actively contribute to diversification by alleviating some of the real-world obstacles that otherwise retard development.
ISSN:1360-0818
1469-9966
DOI:10.1080/13600810903305208