Management practices associated with pain in cattle on western Canadian cow-calf operations: A mixed methods study

• Published in: Journal of animal science Vol. 95; no. 2; p. 958
• Main Authors: Moggy, M A, Pajor, E A, Thurston, W E, Parker, S, Greter, A M, Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K S, Campbell, J R, Windeyer, M C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.02.2017
• Subjects: Animals; Canada - epidemiology; Cattle; Cattle Diseases - epidemiology; Cattle Diseases - therapy; Data Collection; Dystocia - veterinary; Female; Orchiectomy - veterinary; Pain - veterinary; Pain Management - methods; Pain Management - veterinary; Pregnancy; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 1525-3163; 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.2527/jas2016.0949

The implementation of on-farm pain mitigation strategies is dependent on feasibility and importance to producers. Currently, there is a lack of information regarding adoption of management practices associated with pain in cattle within the Canadian beef industry. The objective of this mixed methods study was to describe pain-associated practices implemented on farm and producer perceptions toward pain mitigation strategies. A questionnaire about calving management and calf processing was delivered to 109 cow-calf producers in western Canada. In addition, 15 respondents were purposively selected based on questionnaire responses to participate in individual semistructured, on-farm interviews. The prevalence of pain mitigation strategies used for dystocia and cesarean section by respondents were 46 and 100%, respectively. The majority of operations reported castrating and dehorning calves before 3 mo of age (95 and 89%, respectively). The majority of operations did not use pain mitigation strategies for castration and dehorning (90 and 85%, respectively). Branding was practiced by 57% of respondents, 4% of which used pain mitigation. Thematic content analysis revealed that producers' perception of pain were influenced by what they referred to as "common sense," relatability to cattle, visual evidence of pain, and age of the animal. Factors that influenced participant rationale for the implementation of pain mitigation practices included access to information and resources, age of the animal, benefit to the operation, cost and logistics, market demands, and personal conscience. Overall, management practices were generally in compliance with published Canadian guidelines. Results of this study may provide direction for future policy making, research, and extension efforts to encourage the adoption of pain mitigation strategies.