Alcuzcuz and Muslims “de nación”: Naturalizing Religious Difference in Debates about Enslavement in Early Modern Granada and Manila

It is no accident that the literary and historical paper trail of early modern Spain and the Spanish empire is littered with racialized names and terminologies that activate associations with Islam. This article analyzes the roles of naming choices across different genres of writing via integrated c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Sixteenth century journal Vol. 55; no. 1-2; pp. 31 - 55
Main Author Feild-Marchello, Erica
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago University of Chicago Press 01.03.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is no accident that the literary and historical paper trail of early modern Spain and the Spanish empire is littered with racialized names and terminologies that activate associations with Islam. This article analyzes the roles of naming choices across different genres of writing via integrated case studies of the 1567 Pragmatic, a local rebuttal to that pragmatic, and royal orders and laws regarding enslavement practices in Granada and the Philippines, as well as the play Amar después de la muerte by Calderón de la Barca to shed light on the traffic of rhetorical strategies between literary and historical documents, as well as between Spain and the Philippines. It argues that early modern writers (from playwrights to court and colonial officials to King Felipe II) frequently drew on racialized vocabularies that mobilized naturalized understanding of religious inheritance as they entered into debates regarding the enslavement of Muslims (in the Philippines) and converts from Islam and their descendants (in Spain).
ISSN:0361-0160
2326-0726
DOI:10.1086/731064