Evidence for ‘like’ as a Focus Marker

Several functions have been proposed for the colloquial discourse particle like. This paper examines possible evidence for like as a focus marker. While this hypothesis seems plausible, it has been posited with insufficient definition or detail regarding the type of focus involved. It is also not cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLanaguage Research Vol. 57; no. 1; pp. 1 - 29
Main Author Lee, Kent
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Seoul 서울대학교 언어교육원 01.01.2021
Seoul National University
언어교육원
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Several functions have been proposed for the colloquial discourse particle like. This paper examines possible evidence for like as a focus marker. While this hypothesis seems plausible, it has been posited with insufficient definition or detail regarding the type of focus involved. It is also not clear how this aligns with other likely functions proposed for this discourse particle: for example, as a hedge marker or an approximator. This paper reports on a preliminary empirical study with small sets of conversational data of spoken colloquial American English. Its syntactic patterns and pragmatic usage suggest that like is used in a manner comparable to that of additive focus markers, exemplifiers, and other discourse markers. In such cases, it can function as an additive focus marker of indirect contrast, in addition to its well attested use as a hedge marker. Sentence-initial it's like may have similar properties. Analyzing like as an additive marker allows for reconciliation of its various proposed functions by treating it as a multifunctional marker. The findings also indicate many avenues for further research.
ISSN:0254-4474
2586-7113
DOI:10.30961/lr.2021.57.1.1