The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of national joint registry data

• Published in: The bone & joint journal Vol. 98-B; no. 10; pp. 1347 - 1354
• Main Authors: Palan, J, Smith, M C, Gregg, P, Mellon, S, Kulkarni, A, Tucker, K, Blom, A W, Murray, D W, Pandit, H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.10.2016
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects; Bone Cements; Female; Femur - surgery; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology; Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Registries; Reoperation; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom - epidemiology; Fixation; Stem design; Revision; Periprosthetic fracture; Total hip arthroplasty
• ISSN: 2049-4394; 2049-4408
• DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.36534

Periprosthetic fracture (PF) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication. This study aims to investigate the influence of cemented stem designs on the risk of needing a revision for a PF. We analysed data on 257 202 primary THAs with cemented stems and 390 linked first revisions for PF recorded in the National Joint Registry (NJR) of England, Wales and Northern Ireland to determine if a cemented femoral stem brand was associated with the risk of having revision for a PF after primary THA. All cemented femoral stem brands with more than 10 000 primary operations recorded in the NJR were identified. The four most commonly used cemented femoral stems were the Exeter V40 (n = 146 409), CPT (n = 24 300), C-Stem (n = 15 113) and Charnley (n = 20 182). We compared the revision risk ratios due to PF amongst the stems using a Poisson regression model adjusting for patient factors. Compared with the Exeter V40, the age, gender and ASA grade adjusted revision rate ratio was 3.89 for the cemented CPT stem (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.07 to 4.93), 0.89 for the C-Stem (95% CI 0.57 to 1.41) and 0.41 for the Charnley stem (95% CI 0.24 to 0.70). The limitations of the study include incomplete data capture, analysis of only PF requiring revision and that observation does not imply causality. Nevertheless, this study demonstrates that the choice of a cemented stem may influence the risk of revision for PF. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1347-54.