Tucker-3 decomposition with sparse core array using a penalty function based on Gini-index

Tucker-3 decomposition is a dimension reduction method for tensor data, similar to principal component analysis. One of the characteristics of Tucker-3 is the core array, which represents the interactions between low-dimensional spaces. However, it is difficult to interpret the result when the numbe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese journal of statistics and data science Vol. 5; no. 2; pp. 675 - 700
Main Authors Tsuchida, Jun, Yadohisa, Hiroshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Nature Singapore 01.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Tucker-3 decomposition is a dimension reduction method for tensor data, similar to principal component analysis. One of the characteristics of Tucker-3 is the core array, which represents the interactions between low-dimensional spaces. However, it is difficult to interpret the result when the number of elements in the core array is large. One solution to this problem is using sparse estimation, such as the L1 regularization method, for the core array. However, some regularization methods often sacrifice the model fit too much. To solve this issue, we propose a novel estimation method for Tucker-3 decomposition with a penalty function based on the Gini index, which is a measure of sparsity and variance. Maximizing the Gini index is expected to obtain an estimated value for the core array that is easy to interpret. Moreover, the model fitted to the data will not involve shrinkage much because the Gini index is a measure of variance, which is one of the model fit measures of Tucker-3. The nonconvex problem poses a challenge when using the proposed penalty function based on the Gini index. To address this problem, we develop a majorization–minimization algorithm. From a numerical example, we revealed that the performance (the precision and accurate prediction of zero cells) of our method is superior to that of the estimation method with existing penalties, such as the L1 penalty, smoothly clipped absolute deviation, and minimax concave penalty.
ISSN:2520-8756
2520-8764
DOI:10.1007/s42081-022-00179-7