In-vitro Comparative Assessment of Antibacterial and Anti-adherent Effect of Two Types of Surface Modificants on Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Against Streptococcus mutans

Objective: Comparative evaluation of antibacterial and anti-adherent properties of surface-modified stainless steel (SS) orthodontic brackets against Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans). Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 120 SS orthodontic McLaughlin, Bennett, Trevisi (MBT) 0.022″ slot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Indian Orthodontic Society Vol. 56; no. 3; pp. 282 - 289
Main Authors Math, Mrunmaye, Shah, Alok G., Gangurde, Parag, Karandikar, Anita G., Gheware, Anjali, Jadhav, Bhagyashree S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Delhi, India SAGE Publications 01.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: Comparative evaluation of antibacterial and anti-adherent properties of surface-modified stainless steel (SS) orthodontic brackets against Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans). Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 120 SS orthodontic McLaughlin, Bennett, Trevisi (MBT) 0.022″ slot by Leone, Italy. Orthodontic brackets that constituted the sample size were divided into 6 groups, consisting of 20 samples each in two control (non-surface coated) and four experimental groups. The experimental group’s surface coatings were photocatalytic zinc oxide (ZnO) and photocatalytic titanium oxide (TiO2), which were carried out by radiofrequency (RF) magnetron sputtering method for surface modification. Brackets were subjected to microbiological tests against S. mutans. For anti-adherence, weight change, pre- and postexposure, was evaluated to gauge the adherence of bacteria and colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL) count measuring the survival rate of bacterial cells for antibacterial activity. Results: The TiO2-coated group showed statistically significant anti-adherence (P-value < .05) against S. mutans than control and ZnO groups. The CFU count of TiO2 group was lower than control as well as ZnO group. Conclusion: TiO2 is superior to ZnO and should be continued to be considered for surface modification of orthodontic brackets against White Spot Lesions (WSLs) and gingivitis.
ISSN:0301-5742
0974-9098
DOI:10.1177/03015742211037298