Surface-Electric-Potential Characteristics of Tribo- and Corona-Charged Polymers: A Comparative Study

The ability of polymers to acquire and retain electrostatic charges is valued in designing new equipment like electrostatic separators, electret filters, and powder coating devices. Several recent studies have pointed out the beneficial effect of electric charges on the lubricated contacts. The aim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on industry applications Vol. 53; no. 3; pp. 2423 - 2431
Main Authors Prawatya, Yopa Eka, Neagoe, Marian Bogdan, Zeghloul, Thami, Dascalescu, Lucian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.05.2017
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The ability of polymers to acquire and retain electrostatic charges is valued in designing new equipment like electrostatic separators, electret filters, and powder coating devices. Several recent studies have pointed out the beneficial effect of electric charges on the lubricated contacts. The aim of this paper is to compare two physical mechanisms of electric charging of polymers: 1) triboelectric effect; and 2) corona discharge. The experiments are performed with 5-mm-thick samples of Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, poly-vinyl-chloride, and polypropylene. The cartography of the electric potential is made using the induction probe of an electrostatic voltmeter. The tribocharging is done by back and forth movement of two polymer plates in conformal contact with each other (speed: 7 to 30 mm/s; constant normal force: 10 N). Uniform corona charging is performed by moving the sample in the space charge zone generated by a wire-type high-voltage electrode used in a triode configuration with the potential of the grid electrode set at 1 and 2 kV. The electric potential at the surface of tribocharged polymers is less uniform, but decays slower than that of corona-charged samples.
ISSN:0093-9994
1939-9367
DOI:10.1109/TIA.2017.2650145