The Structural Relationship Model of Indicators of Outstanding Leadership for Teachers under the Local Administrative Organizations

The objectives of this research were to: 1) Study the suitability of the indicators to be included in the model, 2) Test the consistency of the model developed from the theories and research studies' empirical data, 3) Evaluate reliability value of the main components, the sub-components and ot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of educational methodology Vol. 7; no. 2; pp. 235 - 249
Main Authors Nonthing, Komsan, Supakicco, Phramaha Suphachai
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Eurasian Society of Educational Research 15.05.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The objectives of this research were to: 1) Study the suitability of the indicators to be included in the model, 2) Test the consistency of the model developed from the theories and research studies' empirical data, 3) Evaluate reliability value of the main components, the sub-components and other related indicators. The population used in the research was the teachers in the schools under the local administrative organization of Thailand. The multistage random sampling was used for the selection of 660 participants from a total population of 30,359 teachers across the country. The following results were observed: 1) All of the 52 indicators used in the research were appropriate according to the specified criteria, 2) The theoretical model was found to have been consistent with the empirical data. All of the statistical figures including; Relative Chi-Square, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, Goodness-of-Fit Index, Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index, Comparative Fit Index, and Normed Fit Index: NFI, were found to have met with the specified criteria in both the first and the second confirmation factor analyzes, and 3) The primary element's factor loading was between 0.73 to 1.48, which is higher than the criteria of 0.70, the sub-element's factor loading was between 0.67 to 1.72 and the indicators weight was between 0.68 to 1.37, which is higher than the criteria of 0.30. These results indicate that the theoretical model developed in this research can be effectively used with construct validity for the development of the targeted samples in a research study.
ISSN:2469-9632
2469-9632
DOI:10.12973/ijem.7.2.235