Assessment of tractor track width compatibility with crop inter-row spacing

• Published in: Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 48 - 53
• Main Authors: Akhmetov, A. A., Kambarov, B. A., Kambarova, D. U., Sultanov, Z. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Russian
• Published: Federal Scientific Agroengineering Centre VIM 20.09.2023
• Subjects: crops; inter-row spacing; plants; protective zone; root system; soil; tire; track; tractor; wheel
• ISSN: 2073-7599
• DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2023-17-3-48-53

Various factors can exert detrimental effects on crop growth and development, among which the influence of the machinery's running gear within the machine-tractor unit stands out, particularly within the soil vicinity encompassing the plant's root system. As a result, the area of soil compaction arising from tractor wheel pressure increasingly covers the plant's protective zone. This poses challenges for both root system growth and development, as well as the optimal uptake of soil nutrients, often leads to plant damage or even trampling. Presently, there is no universally accepted metric for assessing the compatibility between tractor track width and the specific inter-row spacing under cultivation. (Research purpose) Development of an indicator to assess the compatibility of the tractor track width with the cultivated inter-row spacing.  (Materials and methods) The analysis demonstrates that the level of compatibility of the tractor track to the crop inter-row spacing is determined based on the dimensions of the crop spacing, the tractor track width, the protective zone outlined by agrotechnical standards, the deviation of the wheel trajectory from the axis of row symmetry, and tire size. (Results and discussion) An analytical correlation has been derived to determine the level of compatibility between tractor track width and crop inter-row spacing, using the context of cotton cultivation as an illustrative example. It has been revealed that among the serial tractors utilized within cotton farms across the region, full-fledged operational performance is exclusively achieved when row spacings measure 60 and 90 centimeters.  In contrast, the utilization of this machinery on row spacings of 70 and 76 centimeters leads to detrimental outcomes such as row trampling and plant damage. (Conclusions) The viability of the developed indicator has been determined and validated. The improvement of the tractor propulsion system should be aimed at devising a technical solution that facilitates seamless adjustment of track width over a broad spectrum, thus allowing for adaptability to diverse row spacing requirements.