Revisiting the Natural History of Tuberculosis The Inclusion of Constant Reinfection, Host Tolerance, and Damage-Response Frameworks Leads to a Better Understanding of Latent Infection and its Evolution towards Active Disease

Once Mycobacterium tuberculosis infects a person it can persist for a long time in a process called latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). LTBI has traditionally been considered to involve the bacilli remaining in a non-replicating state (dormant) in old lesions but still retaining their ability to i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis Vol. 58; no. 1; pp. 7 - 14
Main Author Cardona, Pere-Joan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel 01.02.2010
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Once Mycobacterium tuberculosis infects a person it can persist for a long time in a process called latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). LTBI has traditionally been considered to involve the bacilli remaining in a non-replicating state (dormant) in old lesions but still retaining their ability to induce reactivation and cause active tuberculosis (TB) once a disruption of the immune response takes place. The present review aims to challenge these concepts by including recent experimental data supporting LTBI as a constant endogenous reinfection process as well as the recently introduced concepts of damage-response and tolerance frameworks to explain TB induction. These frameworks highlight the key role of an exaggerated and intolerant host response against M. tuberculosis bacilli which induces the classical TB cavity in immunocompetent adults once the constant endogenous reinfection process has resulted in the presence of bacilli in the upper lobes, where they can grow faster and the immune response is delayed. This essay intends to provide new clues to understanding the induction of TB in non-immunosuppressed patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0004-069X
1661-4917
DOI:10.1007/s00005-009-0062-5