Implant-related artifacts around metallic and bio-integrative screws: a CT scan 3D Hounsfield unit assessment

Objective: To assess the degree of implant-related artifacts (IRA) around metallic and bio-integrative (BI) cannulated screws using Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT). Our hypothesis was that BI implants would demonstrate significantly decreased IRA around the inserted screws. Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Foot & Ankle (Online) Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 95 - 99
Main Authors VandeLune, Christian, Tazegul, Tutku, J Ahrenholz, Samuel, Iehl, Caleb, Vivtcharenko, Victoria, Schmidt, Eli, N Dibbern, Kevin, Lee, Hee Young, Lalevee, Matthieu, Barbachan Mansur, Nacime Salomão, De César Netto, César
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Associação Brasileira de Medicina e Cirurgia do Tornozelo e Pé - ABTPé 31.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To assess the degree of implant-related artifacts (IRA) around metallic and bio-integrative (BI) cannulated screws using Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT). Our hypothesis was that BI implants would demonstrate significantly decreased IRA around the inserted screws. Methods: In this cadaveric CT imaging study, we used 2 below-knee specimens. Medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy was performed, and the specimens were fixed with either metallic or BI screws. HU values were measured over 4 different lines that crossed the osteotomy position. Results: The mean HU value was decreased in the BI implants compared to the metallic ones in 3 different positions: near the screw, directly over the screw, and inside the screw cannula. At the line placed 1 cm dorsal to the screw, the HU value for the metallic screw was lower than that for the BI screw. Conclusions: We found metallic implants to demonstrate significantly increased HU values in regions close to the implant and significantly decreased values 1 cm away from the implant, when compared to the BI screw. The decreased HU values 1 cm away from the implant could be due to a shielding effect of the surrounding bone, hindering the assessment of union and healing. BI implants represent an alternative to decrease these IRA effects. Level of Evidence III; Case-Control Study.
ISSN:2675-2980
2675-2980
DOI:10.30795/jfootankle.2021.v15.1562