Anthropometric Measures for Predicting the Risk of Hypertension in Young Adults: Insights from a Representative Population

Background: Obesity is linked to an unhealthy diet and lack of exercise, elevating the risk of hypertension. Elevated blood pressure and a higher risk of hypertension are linked to an increased BMI. Lifestyle changes in adults, like inactivity and poor diet, contribute to the rise in cardiovascular...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNational Board of Examinations Journal of Medical Sciences Vol. 2; no. 4; pp. 389 - 399
Main Authors DH, Kanyakumari, KG, Rudramurthy, Kadli, Suresh U, Rangareddy, Harish
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published National Board of Examinations 01.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Obesity is linked to an unhealthy diet and lack of exercise, elevating the risk of hypertension. Elevated blood pressure and a higher risk of hypertension are linked to an increased BMI. Lifestyle changes in adults, like inactivity and poor diet, contribute to the rise in cardiovascular diseases among younger people. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship in a young adult population between Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Body Mass Index (BMI), Relative Fat Mass (RFM), Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WH ratio), and Waist-to-Height ratio (WHtR). Additionally, the study objective was to determine the predictive value of BMI and RFM for hypertension in young adults. Methods: Participants were selected using opportunistic sampling of medical students presenting for the Physiology practical as a representative sample of young adults in this cross-sectional study. The anthropometric measurements of BMI, RFM, WH ratio, and WHtR were measured and compared between subjects with MAP≤90 mmHg and MAP>90 mmHg. Results: The chi-square test revealed a strong association between obesity and elevated mean arterial pressure (>90 mmHg). Employing a BMI cut-off (>25kg/m2) demonstrated 67.74% sensitivity and 77.78% specificity for hypertension detection, while RFM (cut-off 36.6) exhibited 52.17% sensitivity and 64.52% specificity. There was a significant positive correlation of BMI with MAP (r = 0.408, p < 0.001) and a significant difference between groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The effectiveness of BMI and WHtR in our study underscore the significance of multiple anthropometric indices for comprehensive obesity and cardiovascular risk assessment. Future prospective studies play a crucial role in uncovering the clinical importance of modern anthropometric measurements and biomarkers, providing valuable information to improve tools for assessing obesity and accurately representing public health.
ISSN:2583-7524
2583-7524
DOI:10.61770/NBEJMS.2024.v02.i04.011