Visual and spatial long‐term memory: differential pattern of impairments in Williams and Down syndromes

This purpose of this study was to investigate visual‐object and visual‐spatial long‐term memory (LTM) abilities in individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) and Down syndrome (DS). Four groups comprised of 15 participants were included: WS group (10 males) with a mean chronological age (CA) of 18 year...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDevelopmental medicine and child neurology Vol. 47; no. 5; pp. 305 - 311
Main Authors Vicari, Stefano, Bellucci, Samantha, Carlesimo, Giovanni Augusto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2005
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This purpose of this study was to investigate visual‐object and visual‐spatial long‐term memory (LTM) abilities in individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) and Down syndrome (DS). Four groups comprised of 15 participants were included: WS group (10 males) with a mean chronological age (CA) of 18 years 5 months, SD 6 years 4 months, and mean mental age (MA) of 6 years 8 months, SD 1 year 5 months; WS control group (eight males) comprised of typically developing children (CA mean 6y 7mo, SD 8mo); DS group, (10 males, CA mean 16y 5mo, SD 5y 10mo; MA mean 5y 4mo, SD 8mo); and DS control group (seven males) formed by typically developing children (CA mean 5y 6mo, SD 7mo). In the WS and DS groups mental age and IQ were evaluated with the Form L‐M of the Stanford‐Binet Intelligence Scale. Results showed that individuals with WS showed decreased learning of visual‐spatial material but substantially typical learning of visual‐object patterns as compared to a group of mental‐age‐matched typically developing children. Individuals with DS showed the opposite profile, i.e. typical learning of visual‐spatial sequences but impaired learning of visual‐object patterns. These results, showing an interesting double dissociation between these two genetic syndromes in the learning of visual‐object patterns as opposed to visual‐spatial data, support the interpretation of learning disability* as a heterogeneous condition, characterized by potentially very different qualitative profiles of cognitive impairment.
ISSN:0012-1622
1469-8749
DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2005.tb01141.x