Preseasonal intranasal immunotherapy in birch-alder allergic rhinitis. A double-blind study
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out to test the clinical efficacy and safety of local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) in powder form. Twenty-two patients suffering from allergic rhinitis strictly associated with early spring symptoms, with positive skin prick tests and RAST for birch...
Saved in:
Published in | Allergy (Copenhagen) Vol. 51; no. 5; p. 299 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Denmark
01.05.1996
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out to test the clinical efficacy and safety of local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) in powder form. Twenty-two patients suffering from allergic rhinitis strictly associated with early spring symptoms, with positive skin prick tests and RAST for birch-alder, all responders to a specific nasal provocation test (NPT), received randomly active or placebo treatment for 4 months. Immunotherapy consisted of administration of a set of capsules containing progressively increasing amounts of birch (Betula pendula) and speckled alder (Alnus incana) allergens in powder form with controlled granulometry. The active (birch-alder) and placebo (lactose) group completed the treatment according to a similar schedule. During the pollen season (March-April), the patients who took the active treatment reported less sneezing and rhinorrhea than the placebo group, on the basis of a symptoms score, and the differences were statistically significant; the need for drugs (terfenadine) was also significantly reduced. These findings agreed well with the results of specific NPT after the treatment; only patients in the active group had a higher threshold dose of nasal specific reactivity to birch-alder allergens than in tests before the LNIT. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0105-4538 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1996.tb00089.x |