The potential and limitations of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration: A comment
On 19 December 2018 the UN General Assembly approved the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM), with 152 votes in favor, five against (Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Poland, United States), 12 abstentions (Algeria, Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Chile, Italy, Latvia, Libya, L...
Saved in:
| Published in | Torture Vol. 29; no. 1; pp. 127 - 132 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
23.05.2019
|
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Summary: | On 19 December 2018 the UN General Assembly approved the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM), with 152 votes in favor, five against (Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Poland, United States), 12 abstentions (Algeria, Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Chile, Italy, Latvia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Romania, Singapore, Switzerland), and 24 countries not voting (UN, 2018). The GCM builds on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN, 2015) and on the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants 2016 (of which it aims to implement Annex II) (UN, 2016). The article discusses the Global compact for migration, highlighting its potential and limits, supporters and detractors. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1018-8185 1997-3322 |
| DOI: | 10.7146/torture.v29i1.112217 |