Response to Wilson: Forget Multiple Tools; Use Mathematica

In the Summer 1996 issue of IEEE CS&E, the original article by Wilson and the reply by McConnel propose two quite different curricula. The first focuses on the various tasks an engineer must perform, and the second on more fundamental aspects of software engineering. Both are important to teach...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE computational science & engineering Vol. 3; no. 3; pp. 59 - 61
Main Author Issaevitch, T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.01.1996
Subjects
Education
Engineering profession
High level languages
Knowledge engineering
Mathematical programming
Physics computing
Programming profession
Software performance
Software tools
Stress
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1070-9924
DOI10.1109/MCSE.1996.537094

Cover

More Information
Summary:In the Summer 1996 issue of IEEE CS&E, the original article by Wilson and the reply by McConnel propose two quite different curricula. The first focuses on the various tasks an engineer must perform, and the second on more fundamental aspects of software engineering. Both are important to teach and both authors make good cases. Rather than add to this discussion, the present report focuses on the medium (language) in which these subjects and principles should be taught. With a proper choice of language, both curricular goals can be achieved.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1070-9924
DOI:10.1109/MCSE.1996.537094