University of Adelaide Higher Degree by Research Program Supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

• Published in: Prehospital and disaster medicine Vol. 34; no. s1; p. s27
• Main Author: Filmer, Leighton
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.05.2019; Jems Publishing Company, Inc
• Subjects: Collaboration; Data collection; Disasters; Earthquakes; Emergency Medical Teams; Emergency preparedness; Medical personnel; Qualitative research; Seismic activity; Nepal
• ISSN: 1049-023X; 1945-1938
• DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X19000748

Introduction: Collaboration between Foreign Medical Teams (FMT) and Host Health Personnel (HHP) is a core standard for healthcare in a medical response to disaster,1 but descriptions of its application from recipient nation HHP are rare. This paper details the findings from a qualitative study on the experience of collaboration between International Foreign Teams (IMT) and HHP in Gorkha, Nepal since the 2015 earthquake. Aim: To present findings from a study that explored the experience of collaboration by Nepal health workers working with IMT since the 2015 earthquake. Methods: A qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews regarding the experiences and perspectives on collaboration of 12 Nepali health workers was used. The interviews were transcribed, translated, and collated using Nvivo software by QSR international, and themes regarding collaboration were identified. Results: Data collection is not yet complete. However, preliminary results from early analysis indicate that collaborative practice is not uniformly applied by IMT. HHP Satisfaction with IMT appears highly dependent on collaboration. Emerging themes are that rigid organizational procedures, language and cultural barriers, and intimidating leadership inhibit collaboration. Objectives were assumed to align immediately post-disaster, with evidence of objectives increasingly diverging over time. IMT leadership that was experienced, responsive to suggestions, and regularly involved HHP in planning, implementing, and reviewing activities were highly appreciated. Discussion: Emerging themes indicate the time-critical nature of many disasters, along with cultural/institutional/administrative barriers, make the building of collaborative relationships difficult despite being foundational for successful missions. Participants in IMT must proactively involve HHP in the objectives setting, planning, implementation, and reviewing of activities. Successful IMT participation is not only clinically competent but actively seeks collaborative relationships with HHP throughout the mission.