Evolution of primary care referrals to urology. Impact of a protocol on prostate disease and continuing education

• Published in: Actas urológicas españolas (English ed.) Vol. 39; no. 5; pp. 296 - 302
• Main Authors: Sopeña-Sutil, R, Tejido-Sánchez, A, de Urbina, M. Galván-Ortiz, Guerrero-Ramos, F, García-Álvarez, G, Passas-Martínez, J.B
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier España 01.06.2015
• Subjects: Atención primaria; Benign prostatic hypertrophy; Hiperplasia prostática benigna; Primary care; PSA; Urology; Atención primaria; Benign prostatic hypertrophy; Primary care; Hiperplasia prostática benigna; PSA
• ISSN: 2173-5786; 2173-5786
• DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2015.04.006

Abstract Objective To analyze the evolution of primary care referrals to the Urology Department after the implementation of a joint protocol on prostate disease and a continuing education program in our healthcare area. Material and methods In January 2011, we launched an action protocol on prostate disease, which was complemented by training sessions and an e-mail-based consultation system. We analyzed primary care referrals to the Urology Department between 2011 and 2013 and determined the reasons for the consultations and the compliance with the established criteria on prostate disease. We obtained data from the “Request for Appointment in Specialized Care” program of the Community of Madrid. We calculated the sample size with a 95% confidence level and a 50% heterogeneity. Results A total of 19,048 referrals were conducted. The most common reason for the referrals was lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostate hyperplasia, with a 27% reduction and a compliance that went from 46% at 67%. Although prostate-specific antigen consultations increased by 40%, they improved their appropriateness (from 55% to 72%). This was the main type of consultation for suspicion of malignancy (30%). Also worth mentioning were female incontinence, which doubled in number, and a 41% reduction in erectile dysfunction, which could be due to the primary care training. Conclusions The collaboration between the Department of Urology and primary care succeeded in improving the appropriateness of prostate disease referrals and modified the tendency to refer the rest of the diseases included in the project.