Data Systems and Reports as Active Participants in Data Interpretation

Most data-informed decision-making in education is undermined by flawed interpretations. Educator-driven interventions to improve data use are beneficial but not omnipotent, as data misunderstandings persist at schools and school districts commended for ideal data use support. Meanwhile, most data s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUniversal journal of educational research (Print) Vol. 4; no. 11; pp. 2493 - 2501
Main Author Rankin, Jenny Grant
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Horizon Research Publishing 01.11.2016
Subjects
Accuracy
California
Data Collection
Data Interpretation
Decision Making
Documentation
Educational Technology
Evidence Based Practice
Information Systems
Information Utilization
Qualitative Research
Statistical Analysis
Student Records
California
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Most data-informed decision-making in education is undermined by flawed interpretations. Educator-driven interventions to improve data use are beneficial but not omnipotent, as data misunderstandings persist at schools and school districts commended for ideal data use support. Meanwhile, most data systems and reports display figures without supporting guidance concerning the data's proper interpretation, and data reports often do not reflect best design practices for effective communication of data. Yet there are strong evidence data systems and reports, if modified to adhere to research-based best practices, can play an active role in supporting understanding of the data and appropriate use of the data. This paper features examples of how Over-the-Counter Data Standards can be applied to data systems and reports in order to report data to educators in ways most likely to render appropriate interpretation. These standards are derived from a quantitative study of 211 educators and a qualitative study of over 300 studies and other expert sources investigating how to best improve data systems and reports. This paper's examples involve enhancing data with labels, supplemental documentation, a help system, effective package/display, and adequate content. Educators' data interpretations were 205 to 436 percent more accurate depending on the standard applied to their data reporting tools.
ISSN:2332-3205
DOI:10.13189/ujer.2016.041101