Measured and simulated spectra for a 22Na source in a well counter

This paper presents a test of a methodology to describe the shape of true and accidental coincidence gamma-ray spectra. The effect of the coincidence summing was enhanced by using a 50 kBq 22Na source in a NaI well counter. The spectra were described by convoluting Monte Carlo simulated spectra in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiation measurements Vol. 121; pp. 77 - 85
Main Authors de Meijer, Robert J., Lindsay, Robbie, Tijs, Marco, van der Veeke, Steven, Limburg, Han
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper presents a test of a methodology to describe the shape of true and accidental coincidence gamma-ray spectra. The effect of the coincidence summing was enhanced by using a 50 kBq 22Na source in a NaI well counter. The spectra were described by convoluting Monte Carlo simulated spectra in a spreadsheet for true, as well accidental coincidence summing. In this paper we show that applying convolution techniques to the MCNP simulated probability spectra, not only allows a reconstruction of the shape of the true coincidence spectrum, but the simulations also prove to be an invaluable tool to understand the continuum in the spectra made up of double and even triple random coincidences. Each of these summing processes was used to generate so-called standard spectra that may be used in a full-spectrum analysis of the measured spectra to quantitatively derive the contributions of each of the summing processes. For the case presented it is shown that the accidental coincidences can be accounted for to a 0.1% level, a considerable improvement to the precision in previous papers. •A methodology is tested to describe true and accidental coincidence γ-ray spectra by convoluting MC spectra in a spreadsheet.•The simulations prove to be invaluable to understand the continuum in the spectra by 2nd and triple random coincidences.•Accidental coincidences can be accounted for to a 0.1% level, a considerable improvement in precision.
ISSN:1350-4487
1879-0925
DOI:10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.11.009