The Effect of Response Mode on Finger Localization Errors

Four different administrations of a finger localization test were given to each of 18 non-defective first-grade school children; the order of administration was varied over subjects in a manner designed to minimize practice effects. In all administrations the subject's hand was hidden from view...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCortex Vol. 4; no. 3; pp. 233 - 244
Main Authors Stone, F. Beth, Robinson, Donald L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.09.1968
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0010-9452
1973-8102
DOI10.1016/S0010-9452(68)80002-4

Cover

More Information
Summary:Four different administrations of a finger localization test were given to each of 18 non-defective first-grade school children; the order of administration was varied over subjects in a manner designed to minimize practice effects. In all administrations the subject's hand was hidden from view, but a two-dimensional model of the hand was in view just above his hand. In two administrations (one with a model that bore numbers on the fingers and one with a model that had no numbers) the subject responded verbally by saying the number of the finger touched; in the other two administrations (again, one with numbered model and one with unnumbered model) the subject responded nonverbally by pointing to the corresponding finger on the model. It was found that subjects made significantly lower error scores when responding verbally than when pointing. Type of model, whether numbered or not, had no discernible process.
ISSN:0010-9452
1973-8102
DOI:10.1016/S0010-9452(68)80002-4