Intraocular Irrigating Solutions
Background: Two intraocular irrigating solutions which differ principally by the presence of oxidized glutathione were compared in this randomized, masked, prospective study to discern differences in preservation of endothelial cell size. Methods: Sixty-four patients undergoing extracapsular catarac...
Saved in:
Published in | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Vol. 102; no. 2; pp. 291 - 296 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Inc
01.02.1995
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: Two intraocular irrigating solutions which differ principally by the presence of oxidized glutathione were compared in this randomized, masked, prospective study to discern differences in preservation of endothelial cell size.
Methods: Sixty-four patients undergoing extracapsular cataract extractions were randomized between two irrigating solution groups, Balanced Salt Solution (BSS) Plus (n = 30) and dextrose bicarbonate lactated Ringer's solution (n = 34). Preoperative and postoperative endothelial specular photomicrographs were analyzed for cell size and hexagonality, and the two groups were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance.
Results: Fifty-eight subjects (91%) completed the 2-month study. Change in cell size for the BSS Plus group (n = 28) (mean ± standard error, 29.4 ± 12.3 μm2) was not significantly different from the dextrose bicarbonate lactated Ringer's solution group (n = 30) (27.5 ± 12.9 μm2) (P = 0.92). Groups did not differ significantly in percent hexagonality (P = 0.57) or in the variability of cell size (P = 0.61).
Conclusion: The presence of glutathione in BSS Plus and other minor electrolyte differences between the solutions is not more advantageous with regard to endothelial cell size than dextrose bicarbonate lactated Ringer's solution for standard extracapsular cataract surgery. Cost per 500-m1 bottle of BSS plus is $62 compared with $9.80 for dextrose bicarbonate lactated Ringer's solution. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0161-6420(95)31026-3 |