Treatment Options for Odontoid Fractures. A Comparasion between Anterior and Posterior Approaches

• Published in: Global Spine Journal Vol. 6; no. 1_suppl; p. s-0036-1582712
• Main Authors: Neto, Jamil Farhat, Veiga, José Carlos Esteves, Daniel, Jefferson Walter
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.04.2016
• ISSN: 2192-5682; 2192-5690
• DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1582712

Introduction Odontoid fractures account for 9% to 15% of adult, cervical spine fractures, and are the most common fractures in the geriatric cervical spine. The mechanism of injury generally results from hyperflexion or hyperextension of the cervical spine during low-energy impacts in the elderly or high-energy impacts in the young and middle aged. No consensus exists on the optimal treatment (surgical or conservative) and the most relevant outcome parameter (osseous union, fracture stability or clinical outcome). Neurologic injuries associated with these fractures are rare. Material and Methods This study was a retrospective chart review of 13 patients who were treated for odontoid process fractures between November 2010 and May 2015. Inclusion criteria: Patients with odontoid fractures submitted to surgical treatment. Data were obtained from medical charts and spinal column imaging reports. Medical charts, imaging studies and the patient's outcomes were submitted to descriptive analysis in the pre-operative and post-operative period. The data submitted to descriptive analysis were: Fracture gaps; the direction and degree of odontoid process displacement; the odontoid fracture line anatomy; the degrees of the atlantoaxial instability; and the contact between the fractured odontoid and the axis vertebrae. We used conventional radiographs, three-dimensional computed tomographic (3D-CT) scans, and magnetic resonance images. We used the Grauer Algorithm for defining the surgical treatment modality. We identified the solid bone union through the presence of bony bridges and the definite continuity of cortical bone. Results A total of 13 patients who underwent surgical treatment for odontoid fracture were identified. The patients were 76.9% men, the mean age = 32.92 years. Traffic accidents (69,2%) were the most common cause of trauma. The main symptom was pain (84.6%) in the posterior cervical region. The elapsed median time from accident to surgery was 30 days. Mean follow-up was 20 months. Odontoid screw technics (38,4%) and Harms posterior technic (38,4%) were the most common surgical treatment adopted as primary surgical treatment. The most common Grauer's line fracture type was type B on 8 cases. 2 patients referred chronic cervical pain after surgery, 1(20%) were submitted to anterior technic and 1 (12,5%) posterior technic. We had 2 cases with complications, all submitted to posterior technic, 1 with CSF leak and 1 with vertebral artery lesion. No mortality was observed. Conclusion There was no difference between anterior or posterior approach when analyzing the cervical chronic pain and mortality. However, there were more complications in cases covered by the posterior approach. A well-designed prospective study with a larger number of cases is needed to better elucidate optimal treatment algorithms from both an outcomes and cost-effectiveness perspective.