Assessment of patient safety culture in intensive care units and factors affecting it

• Published in: European journal of public health Vol. 30; no. Supplement_5
• Main Authors: Tlili, M A, Aouicha, W, Lamine, H, Taghouti, E, Dhiab, M B e n, Mtiraoui, A, Thouraya, A, Zedini, C, Ben Rejeb, M, Mallouli, M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Oxford Publishing Limited (England) 01.09.2020
• Subjects: Adverse events; Chi-square test; Cross-sectional studies; Culture; Data collection; Errors; Health care; Health services; Hospitals; Intensive care; Intensive care units; Measuring instruments; Patient safety; Patients; Professionals; Public health; Quality; Quality management; Safety; Social sciences; Statistical tests; Teamwork
• ISSN: 1101-1262; 1464-360X
• DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.530

Abstract Background The intensive care units are a high-risk environments for the occurrence of adverse events with serious consequences. The development of patient safety culture is a strategic focus to prevent these adverse events and improve patient safety and healthcare quality. This study aimed to assess patient safety culture in Tunisian intensive care units and to determine its associated factors. Methods It is a multicenter, descriptive cross-sectional study, among healthcare professionals of the intensive care units in the Tunisian center. The data collection was spread over a period of 2 months (October-November 2017). The measuring instrument used is the validated French version of the Hospital Survey On Patient Safety Culture questionnaire. Data entry and analysis was carried out by the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 20.0) and Epi Info 6.04. Chi-square test was used to explore factors associated with patient safety culture. Results A total of 404 professionals participated in the study with a participation rate of 81.94%, spread over 10 hospitals and 18 units. All dimensions were to be improved. The overall perception of safety was 32.35%. The most developed dimension was teamwork within units with a score of 47.87% and the least developed dimension was the non-punitive response to error (18.6%). The patient safety culture was significantly more developed in private hospitals in seven of the 10 dimensions. Participants working in small units had a significantly higher patient safety culture. It has been shown that when workload is reduced the patient safety culture was significantly increased. Conclusions This study has shown that the patient safety culture still needs to be improved and allowed a clearer view of the safety aspects requiring special attention. Thus, improving patient safety culture. by implementing the quality management and error reporting systems could contribute to enhance the quality of healthcare provided to patients. Key messages The culture of culpability is the main weakness in the study. Encouraging event reporting and learning from errors s should be priorities in hospitals to enhance patient safety and healthcare quality.