Adaptations to a patient navigation program for follow‐up colonoscopy in rural primary care practices

• Published in: Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
• Main Authors: Thompson, Jamie H., Rivelli, Jennifer S., Schneider, Jennifer L., Kenzie, Erin S., Myers, Emily, Coury, Jennifer, Davis, Melinda, Gautom, Priyanka, Coronado, Gloria D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 27.06.2024
• ISSN: 1356-1294; 1365-2753; 1365-2753
• DOI: 10.1111/jep.14068

Abstract Purpose Patient navigation is a recommended practice to improve cancer screenings among underserved populations including those residing in rural areas with care access barriers. We report on patient navigation programme adaptations to increase follow‐up colonoscopy rates after abnormal fecal testing in rural primary care practices. Methods Participating clinics delivered a patient navigation programme to eligible patients from 28 affiliated clinics serving rural communities in Oregon clustered within 3 Medicaid health plans. Patient navigation adaptations were tracked using data sources including patient navigation training programme reflections, qualitative interviews, clinic meetings, and periodic reflections with practice facilitators. Findings Initial, planned (proactive) adaptations were made to address the rural context; later, unplanned (reactive) adaptations were implemented to address the impact of the COVID‐19 global pandemic. Initial planned adaptations to the patient navigation programme were made before the main trial to address the needs of the rural context, including provider shortages and geographic dispersion limiting both patient access to care and training opportunities for providers. Later unplanned adaptations were made primarily in response to COVID‐19 care suspension and staff redeployments and shortages that occurred during implementation. Conclusion While unplanned adaptations were implemented to address the contextual impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on care access patterns and staffing, the changes to training content and context were beneficial to the rural setting overall and should be sustained. Our findings can guide future efforts to optimise the success of such programmes in other rural settings and highlight the important role of adaptations in implementation projects.