Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Metastatic Locally-Advanced Stage Radical Cystectomy Candidates
Administration of chemotherapy before radical cystectomy (RC) in neoadjuvant setting (NAC) or after RC in adjuvant setting (ADJ) are both associated with a survival benefit relative to RC alone. However, no study directly compared the magnitude of such benefit associated with NAC versus ADJ in local...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical genitourinary cancer Vol. 22; no. 5; p. 102132 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.10.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Administration of chemotherapy before radical cystectomy (RC) in neoadjuvant setting (NAC) or after RC in adjuvant setting (ADJ) are both associated with a survival benefit relative to RC alone. However, no study directly compared the magnitude of such benefit associated with NAC versus ADJ in locally-advanced UCUB patients (T3-T4N0M0). We addressed this knowledge gap.
Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2007–2020), we identified T3-T4N0M0 UCUB patients who underwent NAC+RC or RC+ADJ. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. The same methodology was then re-applied in T3 and then T4 patient subgroups.
Of 875 assessable patients, 603 harbored T3 stage (69.0%) and 272 harbored T4 stage (31.0%). Of all 875, 563 (64.0%) underwent RC+ADJ versus 312 (36.0%) NAC+RC. NAC+RC rates increased over time (EAPC=+6.1%, P = .001). Cumulative incidence plots derived five-year CSM rates were 40.3% in NAC+RC versus 36.1% in RC+ADJ patients (P = .2). In multivariable CRR models that also adjusted for OCM, no statistically significant difference in CSM was recorded when NAC+RC was compared to RC+ADJ (HR:0.85, P = .1). Virtually the same observations were made in subgroup analyses where CSM associated with NAC+RC was not different from that recorded in RC+ADJ (HR: 0.89 and P = .4 in T3 stage and HR:0.8 and P = .2 in T4 stage).
In locally-advanced UCUB, NAC rates have sharply increased over time. However, the approach based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to RC have not resulted in a statistically significant CSM benefit relative to RC+ADJ.
No study directly compared neoadjuvant (NAC) versus adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ) T3-T4N0M0 urothelial carcinoma.
Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2007–2020), we identified 875 T3-T4N0M0 UCUB patients who underwent NAC+RC or RC+ADJ.
Our result suggests that in T3-T4N0M0, NAC rates have sharply increased over time. However, the approach based on NAC+ RC have not resulted in a statistically significant survival benefit relative to RC+ADJ. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1558-7673 1938-0682 1938-0682 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102132 |