Supplemental Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injections in Eyes Treated with the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab in the Archway Trial

To determine the proportion and characteristics of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with the Port Delivery System (PDS) with ranibizumab that receive supplemental intravitreal ranibizumab injections because of changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) or cen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOphthalmology retina
Main Authors Nielsen, Jared S, Chang, Andrew, Holekamp, Nancy M, Cavichini-Cordeiro, Melina, Lin, Stephanie L, Heinrich, Dominic, Maass, Katie F, Menezes, Alicia, Singh, Natasha, Pieramici, Dante J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 22.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine the proportion and characteristics of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with the Port Delivery System (PDS) with ranibizumab that receive supplemental intravitreal ranibizumab injections because of changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) or central subfield thickness (CST), or both, and to investigate the safety and efficacy of supplemental injections in eyes with the PDS. Post hoc analyses of data from the phase III, randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-comparator Archway trial (NCT03677934). Adults with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months of screening previously responsive to anti-VEGF therapy. Four hundred eighteen patients were randomized to the PDS with ranibizumab 100 mg/ml with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (Q24W) or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg for 96 weeks. Of the 246 eyes treated with the PDS Q24W and assessed for supplemental treatment criteria, the vast majority (94.6%-98.4%) did not receive supplemental treatment during each retreatment interval, with 87.4% not receiving supplemental treatment at any point during the trial. Of the 31 eyes receiving supplemental treatment, 58.1% received 1 injection and 32.3% received 2. At baseline, eyes receiving supplemental treatment were significantly more likely to have thicker retinas (mean CST, 370.5μm vs. 304.4μm; P = 0.0001), subretinal fluid (54.8% vs. 21.2%; P < 0.0001), and larger pigment epithelial detachment height (215.7 μm vs. 175.9 μm; P = 0.003). These features have previously been associated with difficult-to-treat nAMD. Although BCVA and CST generally remained constant throughout the trial in eyes without supplemental treatment, the small number of eyes receiving supplemental treatment on average lost 1 line of vision from baseline to week 96 (mean, -5.7 ETDRS score letters) and CST continued to increase over time. Absolute BCVA at week 96 was similar irrespective of supplemental treatment status (71.1 and 73.7 letters). Best-corrected visual acuity and CST generally improved within 28 days of supplemental treatment. Although the PDS Q24W effectively maintains vision and retinal stability in most eyes with nAMD, a small proportion of patients with features of difficult-to-treat nAMD may benefit from supplemental intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and initial close monitoring is recommended. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
ISSN:2468-6530
DOI:10.1016/j.oret.2024.06.012