Low dose optimization for total-body 2-[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT imaging: a single-center study on feasibility based on body mass index stratification

Implementing personalization protocol in clinical routine necessitates diverse low-dose PET/CT scan protocols. This study explores the clinical feasibility of one-third (1/3) dose regimen and evaluates the diagnostic image quality and lesion detectability of BMI-based 1/3-injection doses for 2-[ F]F...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean radiology
Main Authors Gu, Taoying, Liu, Siwei, Hou, Xiaoguang, Zhao, Liwei, Ng, Yee Ling, Wang, Jingyi, Shi, Hongcheng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany 30.08.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Implementing personalization protocol in clinical routine necessitates diverse low-dose PET/CT scan protocols. This study explores the clinical feasibility of one-third (1/3) dose regimen and evaluates the diagnostic image quality and lesion detectability of BMI-based 1/3-injection doses for 2-[ F]FDG PET/CT imaging. Seventy-four cancer patients underwent total-body 2-[ F]FDG PET/CT examination, with 37 retrospectively enrolled as full-dose group (3.7 MBq/kg) and 37 prospectively enrolled as the 1/3-dose group (1.23 MBq/kg). The 1/3-dose group was stratified by BMI, with an acquisition time of 5 min (G5), 6 min (G6), and 8 min (G8) for BMI < 25, 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 29, and BMI > 29, respectively. Image quality was subjectively and objectively assessed, and lesion detectability was quantitatively analyzed. Subjective assessments of 1/3-dose and full-dose PET images showed strong agreement among readers (κ > 0.88). In the 1/3-dose group, the Likert scores were above 4. G5, G6, and G8 showed comparable image quality, with G5 demonstrating higher lesion conspicuity than G6 and G8 (p = 0.045). Objective evaluation showed no significant differences in SUV , liver SUV and TBR between 1/3- and full-dose groups (p > 0.05). No statistical differences were observed in the SUV of primary tumor, SUV of liver and TBR across all BMI categories between the 1/3-dose and full-dose groups. Lesion detection rates showed no significant difference between the 1/3-dose (93.24%, 193/207) and full-dose groups (94.73%, 198/209) (p = 0.520). A BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimen is a feasible low-dose alternative with clinically acceptable lesion detectability equivalent to full-dose protocol, potentially expanding the applicability of personalized protocols. This study demonstrated that BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimens for [ F]FDG total-body PET/CT yielded equivalent outputs compared to the full-dose regimen, which aligns with clinical needs for personalization in dose and BMI. Currently, limited personalized low-dose total-body PET/CT protocols are available, particularly for patients with varied BMI. Reducing the radiotracer dose to 1/3 the standard demonstrated comparable image quality and lesion detectability equivalent to full dose. BMI-stratified 1/3-dose regimen is a clinically feasible low-dose alternative.
ISSN:1432-1084
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11039-1