Follicular Fluid Meiosis-Activating Sterol in Assisted Reproductive Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

• Published in: Fertility & reproduction Vol. 2; no. 4; pp. 144 - 159
• Main Authors: Dang, Kien Nguyen, Hashan, Mohammad Rashidul, Minh, Le Huu Nhat, Khalaf, Khalid Muhammad, Ibrahim, Hassan Yousif, Dessi, Alberto, Azzam, Mohamed Abdalla, Loc, Tran Thai Huu, Hirayama, Kenji, Huy, Nguyen Tien
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: World Scientific Publishing 01.12.2020
• Subjects: ffmas; infertility; ivm; meta-analysis
• ISSN: 2661-3182; 2661-3174
• DOI: 10.1142/S2661318220500176

Background: Follicular fluid meiosis-activating sterol (FFMAS) is one of several molecular compounds that has been added into in vitro maturation (IVM) technique with contradictory results. Our study aimed to investigate the effects of FFMAS in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Methods: We searched systematically in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Registry of clinical trials, WHO registry of clinical trials, clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar until July 2017. Meta-analysis was used to investigate the efficacy and safety outcomes of FFMAS. Following the retrieval of potential articles, two independent reviewers screened and extracted included papers rigorously. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for the individual outcome when data was available. Quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane collaboration tool. Results: A total of seven randomized controlled trials involving 1198 participants with 3105 oocytes were explored in this study. Most of the studies were at low risk of bias. Our random effects model meta-analyses in maturation and abnormal embryo rate between FFMAS-exposed oocytes compared with controls revealed no significant differences (summary OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.46–2.16, [Formula: see text] value = 0.99 and summary OR was 1.31, 95% CI 0.84–2.04, [Formula: see text] value = 0.23, respectively). Beside, our study showed a significant increase in uniformly abnormal embryo rate in FFMAS group compared with vehicle control group (summary OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.09–3.61, [Formula: see text] value = 0.03). No significances were noted on meta-analyses of normal embryo rate, uniformly abnormal embryo rate, uniformly normal embryo rate, mosaic embryo rate, abnormal blastomere rate, normal blastomere rate, aneuploidy mosaic embryo rate, and chaotic mosaic embryo rate. Conclusions: FFMAS showed no efficacy in maturation process in human oocytes and there was some evidence for detrimental effects in comparison to vehicle controls. We discouraged any further trials due to safety concern.