Sociolinguistic inference and intercultural coorientation

We present a model that examines the effects of cultural differences on coorientation (the ability of communicators to accurately encode and interpret the referential and relational meanings of messages). Intercultural coorientation is made problematic by the absence of certain shared communication...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman communication research Vol. 27; no. 3; pp. 350 - 381
Main Authors Blake Armstrong, G, Kaplowitz, SA
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2001
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We present a model that examines the effects of cultural differences on coorientation (the ability of communicators to accurately encode and interpret the referential and relational meanings of messages). Intercultural coorientation is made problematic by the absence of certain shared communication system knowledge, which in same‐culture interactions is used in the dynamic sociolinguistic negotiation of relational rights and obligations. We propose that the process of sociolinguistic negotiation of meanings relies fundamentally on probabilistic inference and have constructed a model based on Bayes' theorem. The model predicts the effects of the communication situation, communicator stereotypes and prejudice, and some other‐culture speaker errors on conclusions the receiver draws about the message. Using the model, we distinguish between the ethnocentric error of interpreting a communication in terms of one's own culture and the error of not seeing the communication as diagnostic. Among our predictions are: (a) the less diagnostic the communication, the more impact cultural stereotypes will have on attributions; (b) although evidence of sociolinguistic incompetence sometimes causes misunderstanding, it sometimes prevents misunderstanding; (c) multiple consistent features make intentions clearer than would a single cue, but multiple features violating co‐occurrence norms often lead to the attribution of incompetence.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-CKQ9H8B7-4
istex:C9710C74F058AF16C1E2EC449AC3F320F1B3560B
ArticleID:HCRE350
ISSN:0360-3989
1468-2958
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00785.x