Dose-Response Relationship in Patients with Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Undergoing Radioembolization with 90 Y Glass Microspheres

The benefit of multicompartment dosimetry in the radioembolization of neuroendocrine neoplasms is not firmly established. We retrospectively assessed its potential with patient outcome. Forty-three patients were eligible. The association of mean absorbed dose (MAD) for tumors and treatment response...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 65; no. 8; pp. 1175 - 1180
Main Authors Watanabe, Masao, Leyser, Stephan, Theysohn, Jens, Schaarschmidt, Benedikt, Ludwig, Johannes, Fendler, Wolfgang P, Moraitis, Alexandros, Lahner, Harald, Mathew, Annie, Herrmann, Ken, Weber, Manuel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.08.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The benefit of multicompartment dosimetry in the radioembolization of neuroendocrine neoplasms is not firmly established. We retrospectively assessed its potential with patient outcome. Forty-three patients were eligible. The association of mean absorbed dose (MAD) for tumors and treatment response was tested per lesion with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and the association of MAD with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival was tested per patient using uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The area under the curve for treatment response based on MAD was 0.79 (cutoff, 196.6 Gy; < 0.0001). For global PFS, grade (grade 2 vs. 1: hazard ratio [HR], 2.51; = 0.042; grade 3 vs. 1: HR, 62.44; < 0.001), tumor origin (HR, 6.58; < 0.001), and MAD (HR, 0.998; = 0.003) were significant. For overall survival, no prognostic parameters were significant. In line with prior publications, a MAD of more than 200 Gy seemed to favor treatment response. MAD was also associated with PFS and may be of interest for radioembolization planning for neuroendocrine neoplasm patients.
ISSN:0161-5505
1535-5667
2159-662X
DOI:10.2967/jnumed.124.267774