Examining the Cycle of Physical Frailty in Falls Clinic Attendees Through Structural Equation Modeling

• Published in: Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 227 - 231
• Main Authors: Ortuño, Román Romero, Duggan, Eoin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Greece HYLONOME PUBLICATIONS 01.09.2024
• Subjects: Short Communication; Sarcopenia; Structural equation modeling; Physical frailty phenotype; Falls clinic; Validation studies
• ISSN: 2459-4148; 2459-4148
• DOI: 10.22540/JFSF-09-227

In 1998, Fried and Walston introduced the Cycle of Frailty (CF) as a foundational concept for defining the physical frailty phenotype (FP). While the FP has been extensively validated, the CF hypothesis lacks equivalent support. This study aimed to internally validate the CF using structural equation modeling (SEM) in a clinical dataset of adults aged 50 or older attending an outpatient falls clinic. Measures included: age, morbidity, nutrition, sarcopenia by bioelectrical impedance, VO max, handgrip strength, basal metabolic rate (BMR), 5-times chair stand test (5CST), physical activity, and total energy expenditure (TEE). The SEM, incorporating CF hypothesized causal pathways, was tested using IBM® SPSS® Amos 27.0.0 (maximum likelihood method) with a sample of 102 adults (mean age 69.8 years, 58.8% women). Overall, the SEM was supported by the data (χ = 44.4, df = 37, p = 0.189), with significant (p < 0.05) regression weights for morbidity→sarcopenia, age→sarcopenia, sarcopenia→VO max, sarcopenia→handgrip strength, handgrip strength→5CST, physical activity→TEE, TEE→nutrition, and BMR→TEE. However, nutrition→sarcopenia, sarcopenia→BMR, VO max→5CST, and 5CST→physical activity were not significant. Although the SEM was limited by inclusion of surrogate CF measures (e.g., 5CST instead of gait speed, VO max based on age-predicted maximal/resting heart rate), it provided some internal support for the CF hypothesis.