Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) Method and Multiple Adaline Neural Network Model for Speaker Identification

Speech recognition technology makes human contact with the computer more accessible. There are two phases in the speaker recognition process: capturing or extracting voice features and identifying the speaker's voice pattern based on the voice characteristics of each speaker. Speakers consist o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJOIV : international journal on informatics visualization Online Vol. 7; no. 4
Main Authors Sasongko, Sudi Mariyanto Al, Tsaury, Shofian, Ariessaputra, Suthami, Ch, Syafaruddin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 03.12.2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Speech recognition technology makes human contact with the computer more accessible. There are two phases in the speaker recognition process: capturing or extracting voice features and identifying the speaker's voice pattern based on the voice characteristics of each speaker. Speakers consist of men and women. Their voices are recorded and stored in a computer database. Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC) are used at the voice extraction stage with a characteristic coefficient of 13. MFCC is based on variations in the response of the human ear's critical range to frequencies (linear and logarithmic). The sound frame is converted to Mel frequency and processed with several triangular filters to get the cepstrum coefficient. Meanwhile, at the speech pattern recognition stage, the speaker uses an artificial neural network (ANN) Madaline model (many Adaline/ which is the plural form of Adaline) to compare the test sound characteristics. The training voice's features have been inputted as training data. The Madaline Neural Network training is BFGS Quasi-Newton Backpropagation with a goal parameter of 0,0001. The results obtained from the study prove that the Madaline model of artificial neural networks is not recommended for identification research. The results showed that the database's speech recognition rate reached 61% for ten tests. The test outside the database was rejected by only 14%, and 84% refused testing outside the database with different words from the training data. The results of this model can be used as a reference for creating an Android-based real-time system.
ISSN:2549-9610
2549-9904
DOI:10.30630/joiv.7.4.1376