A Comparative Analysis of Effect of HIV Infection on Outcomes of Cervical Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy

• Published in: International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 117; no. 2; p. e539
• Main Authors: Ratanchandani, K.K., Kulshrestha, A., Shah, S. Patel, Bhuvana, J., Parikh, A., Kunikullaya, S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01.10.2023
• ISSN: 0360-3016; 1879-355X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1830

There is paucity of data on management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive cervical cancer and its clinical outcomes in Indian women. The primary objective of this study was to compare disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) for cervical cancer. The secondary endpoints were toxicity and various factors affecting DFS and OS. Patients diagnosed with cervical cancer on histopathology and treated with RT with or without concomitant chemotherapy (CT) at an institution between 2015 and 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. On the basis of HIV serology test, 70 patients were included in each arm, Arm A had HIV-negative patients and Arm B had HIV-positive patients. In both the arms, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in adjuvant or radical setting was given with a total dose of 46-50 Gy to whole pelvis and iliac nodes; 2 Gy/fraction daily as 5 fractions/week by conventional four-field box technique or conformal 3-dimensional radiotherapy (3DCRT) or Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Concurrent cisplatin was administered as weekly 40mg/m2 to patients with ECOG< = 2, creatinine clearance >40mL/min in radical and adjuvant patients as indicated. CD4 counts ≥200 cells/mm3 was a prerequisite for concurrent cisplatin in Arm B. Intracavitary or interstitial brachytherapy was delivered as indicated. Statistical analysis was done using statistical software. Kaplan-Meier method used for all survival analysis. Log rank test was used to calculate statistical significance for various prognostic factors followed by Cox regression test for multivariate analysis. Median age was 46.5 years (range: 30-76). In Arm A, 62 patients (88.57%) and 5 patients (7.14%) received radical and adjuvant RT. In Arm B 61 patients (87.14%) and 2 patients (2.85%) were given radical and adjuvant RT. 66 patients (94.28%) in Arm A and 52 patients (74.28%) in Arm B received concurrent cisplatin. At a median follow up of 33.8 months (range: 1.2 to 85.4), 2-year DFS was 88.9% for Arm-A and 86.5% for Arm-B (p = 0.134) and 2-year OS was 91.4% and 82.9% for Arm-A and Arm-B (p = 0.001), respectively. Grade III/IV skin toxicity was seen in and 4 patients (5.71%) in Arm A and 12 patients (17.14%) in Arm B (p = 0.34). Grade III/IV gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 2(2.85%) patients and 4(5.7%) patients in Arm A and Arm B respectively (p = 0.40). 14(20%) patients in Arm A and 27(38.5%) patients in Arm B had Grade III/IV hematologic toxicity (p = 0.016). On multivariate analysis, anemia (Hb≤12 gm/dl) and OTT ≥56 days were associated with unfavorable DFS (p = 0.03 and p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01) in Arm B. In view of comparable DFS outcomes in both the arms, HIV-positive cervical cancer patients can be managed with the standard treatment protocol as HIV-negative patients. HIV-positive patients are more likely to experience poorer DFS and OS. However, results need to be validated on prospective study.