Comparison of cervical acid phosphatase papanicolaou stain and standard papanicolaou stain as a screening tool for cancer cervix

Background: Carcinoma cervix is the second most common cancer in women (18%). Cervical smear by routine Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening has significant rates of false- positive and false-negative results. To minimise this, we compare the efficacy of cervical acid phosphatase-papanicolaou (CAP- Pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology Vol. 11; no. 12; p. 3300
Main Authors Nandhini, E, Sasikala, R, Perumal, Varadharaja
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology 01.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Carcinoma cervix is the second most common cancer in women (18%). Cervical smear by routine Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening has significant rates of false- positive and false-negative results. To minimise this, we compare the efficacy of cervical acid phosphatase-papanicolaou (CAP- Pap) smear with conventional Pap smear in detecting premalignant lesions of cervix. The red-colored granules (enzyme coated abnormal cells) that are clearly detected, CAP-Pap positive aids in the quick and early diagnosis of aberrant cells, which speeds up the screening procedure Methods: The present observational study conducted among the patients presenting to gynaecology department for cancer cervix screening. Two cervical smears were collected for Pap and CAP-Pap staining. Cytology report showing abnormality either in Pap smear or CAP-Pap smear were subjected for colposcopy guided cervical biopsy after VIA/VILI and their results were correlated with histopathology reports as gold standard. Results: Total of 321 women were enrolled in the study. On comparison with Cervical biopsy, Pap smear had a sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 50%, Positive predictive value of 88.2%, Negative predictive value of 40.0%. CAP-Pap had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 50%, PPV of 90%, NPV of 100%. As evidenced by the 100% sensitivity, CAP-Pap meets the screening test criteria. Conclusions: The CAP-Pap test has a bright future as a rapid, inexpensive, and efficient method for initial screening or as an addition to Pap smear in primary health care of India for effective cervical cancer screening. Keywords: Papanicolaou, Cervical acid phosphatase test, Premalignant, Biopsy, Screening
ISSN:2320-1770
2320-1789
DOI:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20223120