Vitamin D deficiency and its correlation with pregnancy outcome

Background: There is a growing concern about the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its relationship with variety of diseases worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its association with pregnancy outcome. Methods: This was a cross...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology Vol. 9; no. 4; p. 1493
Main Authors Menon, Maya, Sridevi, T.A, Mohan, Thuthi, Patil, Aruna B
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology 01.04.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: There is a growing concern about the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its relationship with variety of diseases worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its association with pregnancy outcome. Methods: This was a cross sectional study conducted among 150 antenatal women from October 2014 to April 2015. Data containing socio-demographic details, vitamin D level, serum calcium, pregnancy complications and growth situation of newborns were collected and analyzed. Results: A total 150 pregnant women participated in the study, 75.3% were vitamin D deficient, 22.1% vitamin D insufficient and 2.6% normal. There was no significant adverse maternal outcome. NICU admission was required in 28.3 and 15.2% in the vitamin D deficient and insufficient groups respectively. Conclusions: Women from different socioeconomic status, irrespective of parity and educational levels had vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency. This study fails to show a relation of vitamin D deficiency with other high-risk factors of pregnancy and does not show any adverse fetal outcome. Keywords: Fetal outcome, Maternal outcome, Vitamin D deficiency
ISSN:2320-1770
2320-1789
DOI:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20201211