Accuracy of wavefront measurement and the potential effect of erroneous custom corneal correction on the modulation transfer function

Purpose:  To assess the accuracy of repeated measurements of ocular aberrations using wavefront sensing in a small group of observers and to assess the potential effect of measurement error on custom corneal correction. Methods:  A Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor was used to measure the ocular wavef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOphthalmic & physiological optics Vol. 22; no. 6; p. 573
Main Authors Diaz-Santana, L., Davies, N., Lara-Saucedo, D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.11.2002
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose:  To assess the accuracy of repeated measurements of ocular aberrations using wavefront sensing in a small group of observers and to assess the potential effect of measurement error on custom corneal correction. Methods:  A Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor was used to measure the ocular wavefront in nine eyes. Head position was stabilised using a dental bite bar and the pupil centred using a CRT monitor and circular grating. Twenty Shack–Hartmann images were collected for each measurement. Each observer had three sets of measurements taken; the first and the second after careful alignment and the final after regrasping the bite bar in the same position as for the second measurement, but without pupil realignment. The modulation transfer functions for each set were calculated and the effect of ideal custom treatments on the modulation transfer function (MTF) was estimated. Results:  There were highly statistically significant differences in a large number of Zernike modes between the three sets of measurements. The MTFs calculated for the residual wavefronts following ideal custom treatment were below the diffraction limit. The RMS wavefront errors were consistently better for the residual wavefronts obtained using the realigned data than using data taken without pupil realignment. Conclusions:  Sequential measurement of ocular aberrations shows statistically significant differences in a large number of Zernike modes. If aberrations determined by a single measurement are to be used in a custom correction the resulting modulation transfer function is likely to remain below the diffraction limit. Pupil realignment is critical in reduction of the residual root mean square wavefront values to a minimum.
Bibliography:ArticleID:OPO086_5
istex:76FE69966137972726DEE73A3824A1EC8B15E041
ark:/67375/WNG-4XK11WMD-M
ISSN:0275-5408
1475-1313
DOI:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00086_5.x